Review



leptin  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 96
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems leptin
    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h <t>Serum</t> <t>adiponectin</t> levels ( n = 7). i Serum <t>leptin</t> levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
    Leptin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 261 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/leptin/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 261 article reviews
    leptin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Expansion of bone marrow adipocytes in obese mice leads to PD-L1-driven bone marrow immunosuppression and osteoclastogenesis"

    Article Title: Expansion of bone marrow adipocytes in obese mice leads to PD-L1-driven bone marrow immunosuppression and osteoclastogenesis

    Journal: Bone Research

    doi: 10.1038/s41413-026-00509-5

    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h Serum adiponectin levels ( n = 7). i Serum leptin levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
    Figure Legend Snippet: Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h Serum adiponectin levels ( n = 7). i Serum leptin levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

    Techniques Used: Comparison



    Similar Products

    mouse/rat leptin quantikine elisa kit  (Bio-Techne corporation)
    96
    Bio-Techne corporation mouse/rat leptin quantikine elisa kit
    Mouse/Rat Leptin Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by Bio-Techne corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse/rat leptin quantikine elisa kit/product/Bio-Techne corporation
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse/rat leptin quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    leptin  (R&D Systems)
    96
    R&D Systems leptin
    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h <t>Serum</t> <t>adiponectin</t> levels ( n = 7). i Serum <t>leptin</t> levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
    Leptin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/leptin/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    leptin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    elisa  (BioVendor Instruments)
    93
    BioVendor Instruments elisa
    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h <t>Serum</t> <t>adiponectin</t> levels ( n = 7). i Serum <t>leptin</t> levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
    Elisa, supplied by BioVendor Instruments, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/elisa/product/BioVendor Instruments
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    adipokines leptin mob00b  (R&D Systems)
    96
    R&D Systems adipokines leptin mob00b
    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h <t>Serum</t> <t>adiponectin</t> levels ( n = 7). i Serum <t>leptin</t> levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
    Adipokines Leptin Mob00b, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/adipokines leptin mob00b/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    adipokines leptin mob00b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    quantikine elisa kit  (R&D Systems)
    96
    R&D Systems quantikine elisa kit
    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h <t>Serum</t> <t>adiponectin</t> levels ( n = 7). i Serum <t>leptin</t> levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
    Quantikine Elisa Kit, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/quantikine elisa kit/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    quantikine elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    mouse leptin quantikine elisa 589  (R&D Systems)
    96
    R&D Systems mouse leptin quantikine elisa 589
    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h <t>Serum</t> <t>adiponectin</t> levels ( n = 7). i Serum <t>leptin</t> levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
    Mouse Leptin Quantikine Elisa 589, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse leptin quantikine elisa 589/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse leptin quantikine elisa 589 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    mouse leptin quantikine elisa  (R&D Systems)
    96
    R&D Systems mouse leptin quantikine elisa
    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h <t>Serum</t> <t>adiponectin</t> levels ( n = 7). i Serum <t>leptin</t> levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
    Mouse Leptin Quantikine Elisa, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse leptin quantikine elisa/product/R&D Systems
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse leptin quantikine elisa - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h Serum adiponectin levels ( n = 7). i Serum leptin levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

    Journal: Bone Research

    Article Title: Expansion of bone marrow adipocytes in obese mice leads to PD-L1-driven bone marrow immunosuppression and osteoclastogenesis

    doi: 10.1038/s41413-026-00509-5

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Obesity parameters and metabolic phenotype in male B6 mice. a Body weight (g) measurements over 12 weeks for LFD and HFD-fed male B6 mice ( n = 32-41). b Change in weight (%) (dotted line at 28% represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 58% represents parameter for HFD). c Fold change in fat mass (g) (dotted line at 1.0 represents parameter for LFD and dotted line at 3.3 represents parameter for obese-HFD). d Pearson correlation analysis showing that the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss. e Correlation matrix that shows the change in weight or fat mass fold change both negatively correlate to trabecular bone loss (vertical line and horizontal line represent obesity cutoff). f Glucose tolerance test (GTT) for LFD ( n = 26), obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD; n = 34) and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD; n = 7). g Insulin tolerance test (ITT) for LFD, obese HFD-fed (OB-HFD), and non-obese HFD-fed (NO-HFD). h Serum adiponectin levels ( n = 7). i Serum leptin levels. j Serum procollagen type I N-propeptide (P1NP) levels. k Serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b) levels. Analyses for a , f , and g were performed as 2-way ANOVA with Šídák’s multiple comparisons test. Significance for the post-hoc analysis for f , g was defined as: * P < 0.05 LFD vs. OB-HFD, # P < 0.05 LFD vs. NO-HFD-fed, and $ P < 0.05 OB-HFD vs. NO - HFD-fed. Analyses for h , i and k were performed as a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison. Analysis for j was performed as a One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

    Article Snippet: Serum protein analysis of adiponectin (Mouse Adiponectin/Acrp30 Quantikine ELISA, R&D Systems MRP300), leptin (Mouse/Rat Leptin Quantikine ELISA, R&D Systems MOB00B), TRAP (Mousetrap TRAcP 5b ELISA, Immunodiagnostic Systems SB-TR103), CTX-1 (Mouse CTX ELISA Kit, Immunodiagnostic Systems AC-06F1), and P1NP (Rat/Mouse P1NP EIA, Immunodiagnostic Systems AC-33F1) were measured by ELISA according to manufacturer’s instructions.

    Techniques: Comparison